Announcement PDF 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Strong Copper & Silver Results Drive Elizabeth Creek PFS Variability programme reaffirms excellent copper and silver extraction across a range of mineralogies and head grades. Highlights • Preliminary variability test programme completed: Results validate chloride leach flowsheet across samples with different mineral compositions and metal grades. • High copper and silver extraction: Selected representative Emmie Bluff variability composites averaged 94.4% copper and 95.9% silver extraction, with peak extractions of 97.2% copper and 99.7% silver. This demonstrates strong consistency with Scoping Study level estimates1. • Encouraging results using Elizabeth Creek site water: A direct laboratory comparison using the same Emmie Bluff composite returned similar copper and silver extraction with Elizabeth Creek water and fresh tap water. • Cobalt extraction reaches 51.7%: Extraction averaged 39.7% across the same representative Emmie Bluff variability samples. The company is working to improve cobalt leach performance and investigate post-leach recovery options. Coda’s published whole-ore chloride leach base-case economics exclude cobalt revenue. • Further testing and modelling are informing process selection: Work continues on downstream metal recovery, reagent recycling and the alternative flotation process ahead of final flowsheet selection for the PFS. Ongoing Elizabeth Creek PFS Status • PFS Studies Advancing: Metallurgical work continues alongside resource assessment, geotechnical, groundwater, tailings, environmental and mine planning studies. • Key study completions expected shortly: Waste-rock characterisation, flood modelling and comminution (crushing and grinding) test work are expected to be completed in the near term. • Groundwater drilling well advanced: Drilling is progressing on Coda’s deepest production bore at Emmie Bluff. • Process engineering moves forward: Coda has selected Ausenco as its principal process engineering consultant, with metallurgical modelling now underway. Coda Minerals Limited (ASX: COD) has completed preliminary laboratory testing of its preferred whole-ore chloride leach process for the 100%-owned Elizabeth Creek Copper-Silver Project in South Australia. The programme tested performance across samples with different grades and mineral compositions, together with a direct comparison of Elizabeth Creek water and Perth tap water. The results will inform ongoing process assessment and design work for the Pre-Feasibility Study. As part of that process, two key programmes of work have been undertaken: 1 For more details, see “New Flowsheet Delivers Significant Cu-Ag Economic Uplift”, released to the market on 28 August 2025 and available at https://codaminerals.com/announcements/7126651 ASX RELEASE 2026 Code: COD 21st September 2026 ASX:COD 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 • A comparison of leach performance in site water vs fresh tap water using a composite Emmie Bluff sample; and • A programme of “pre-variability” test work, utilising sample made available following its recent drilling programme at the Emmie Bluff and Windabout prospects, which was also undertaken using site water. Key conclusions from the two programmes were: • Site water appears to have no detrimental impact on chloride leaching process and may, due to its existing high salinity, actually improve metal extraction relative to fresh tap water; and • Variability suggests consistently high copper and silver extraction, from representative samples while cobalt extraction has begun to stabilise as the flowsheet has solidified. The Company notes that the results described in this announcement are derived from lab scale batch test work and remain preliminary at this stage. They should be considered indicative under the stated laboratory conditions, not an absolute measure of final metallurgical recovery. Investors are cautioned that these results are not definitive and should not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. Please see full disclaimer below. Pre-Variability2 Testing Preliminary variability test work was undertaken by AMAC Process Solutions in Western Australia on five Emmie Bluff samples and one Windabout sample, from drillholes identified in Figure 1. The samples were leached using a chloride solution following the optimised flowsheet the Company has been developing over the last several months. All tests took place using site water from Elizabeth Creek to improve representivity after the practical use of this water was demonstrated in an earlier test (Table 2). 24-hour leach extractions (including a residue wash stage) across the four most representative Emmie Bluff composites in the variability programme averaged 94.4% copper extraction,95.9% silver extraction, and 39.7% cobalt extraction3. A fifth, deliberately very low-grade and high chalcopyrite composite (DD26EB0051_Lower) was tested as a proof-of-concept rather than a representative sample, and still returned 90.0% Cu and 86.8% Ag extraction, confirming the process extracts metal effectively even from low-grade feed. Table 1 Cu, Co and Ag extraction from Emmie Bluff and Windabout variability composites. Copper mineralogy for key sulphide groups is included as deportment (i.e. % of Cu hosted within a specific mineral/mineral group), as determined by QEMScan. Where mineral percentages do not sum to 100%, the difference is typically made up by “Cu S Fe Intergrowths” or “Other”, neither of which can be specifically allocated to known mineralogies. The first 4 samples (highlighted in orange) are considered by the company to be representative of expected production from Emmie Bluff based on grade. Note that all figures assume a wash step to capture precipitated metal solids, which the company has integrated into its base-case flowsheet. Note that 8-hour samples for DD26EB0050_Upper, DD26EB0051_Upper and DD25WIND0004_Upper were not washed, and therefore no representative result was recorded; unwashed results are available as part of Figure 2 and Figure 3. Mineralogy Feed Grade Metal Extraction (8 hours) Metal Extraction (24 hours) Composite Sample Chalcocite, Covellite, Bornite Chalcopyrite Carrolite Cu (%) Ag (g/t) Co (ppm) Cu (%, 8 hr) Ag (%, 8 hr) Co (%, 8 hr) Cu (%, 24 hr) Ag (%, 24 hr) Co (%, 24 hr) DD26EB0050_Upper 40 21 7 1.28 13 740 87.0% 90.8% 34.2% DD26EB0051_Upper 58 11 2 0.63 14 470 97.2% 99.7% 51.4% DD25EB0046_Merged 64 10 2.5 1.36 13 760 93.6% 97.1% 43.6% 96.9% 97.7% 51.7% DD26EB0050_Lower 51 23 3 2.27 14 1,140 79.3% 85.8% 12.8% 96.4% 95.3% 21.5% DD26EB0051_Lower 16 53 0 0.40 3 100 82.2% 82.4% 26.1% 90.0% 86.8% 22.0% DD25WIND0004_Upper 33 17 5 1.11 14 630 93.4% 96.8% -4 2 The Company has chosen to call this a “Pre-Variability” study, to distinguish from a more comprehensive and detailed variability study which will be undertaken following a final flowsheet selection between whole-ore chloride leach and flotation, with that decision expected in the coming weeks. However, the results of this study still inform the understanding of the process’ applicability to the variable mineralisation at Elizabeth Creek, and the study has been carried out with the same levels of technical rigour that Coda expects from its final PFS variability study. 3 Extraction from composite samples DD26EB0050_Upper, DD26EB0051_Upper, DD25EB0046_Merged and DD26EB0050_Lower ranged from 87.0–97.2% Cu, 90.8–99.7% Ag, and 21.5–51.7% Co extraction. For full details, see Table 1. 4 Cobalt data is not available for this sample due to mass imbalance between fluid and solid assays. All other tests reconciled solid and liquor assays to within acceptable parameters. The Company is repeating the test to confirm cobalt recovery percentage from Windabout ore. 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 The results which are outlined in Table 1, confirmed strong copper extractions across a range of mineralogical compositions and head grades from the Company’s flagship Emmie Bluff deposit. A sample from the Windabout deposit also returned 93.4% copper extraction after 24 hours, supporting continued confidence in the broader applicability of the processing pathway. Commenting on the metallurgical test work, Coda Minerals CEO Chris Stevens said: “These results add momentum to Elizabeth Creek. High copper and silver extraction across a broader range of samples strengthens our confidence in the preferred chloride leach process, while the encouraging site-water results bring the testing closer to the conditions relevant to the project. “For shareholders, the significance is the growing body of evidence supporting the next stage of development studies. We are bringing test work and process modelling together to establish plant requirements, assess costs and select the final PFS flowsheet. This is tangible progress towards defining how Elizabeth Creek could be developed. “Cobalt provides a further opportunity. Our published whole-ore chloride leach base-case economics exclude cobalt revenue, yet these tests achieved more than 50% cobalt extraction in two samples. That gives us a strong reason to pursue the additional value cobalt could bring. Our focus is now on establishing a practical, economic route to capture that potential.” Pre-variability testing will be followed up by more formal variability test work utilising larger samples generated following comminution test work once the Company has made a firm and final selection between the current base-case whole-ore chloride leach and a flotation-based flowsheet with an Albion hydrometallurgical circuit attached. Site Water Testing Two tests of the whole-ore chloride leach flowsheet were performed simultaneously by AMAC Process Solutions in Western Australia on a representative composite Emmie Bluff sample from collars identified in Figure 1 and Table 3. Like the variability samples outlined above, this material was leached using a chloride solution following the optimised flowsheet the Company has been developing over the last several months, with the only difference between the two tests being the use of Elizabeth Creek site water vs Perth tap water. The leach process was completed slightly short of the tests undertaken during the variability programme at 22.5 rather than 24 hours but otherwise utilised an identical flowsheet. The two samples performed similarly (Table 2), with a slight benefit to Perth tap water in the short term, with site water improving over the long term, and once the final wash step is undertaken to recapture metal precipitates. Site water saw a 0.7% improvement in copper and silver extraction relative to tap water, and a 6.6% improvement in cobalt extraction. The superior performance may be caused by the natural salinity of Elizabeth Creek site water, which increases the amount of chloride in solution; further testing would be required to confirm this. Table 2 Cu, Co and Ag extraction from an Emmie Bluff composite leached in site water vs Perth tap water. Mineralogy is reported as per Table 1, above. The testing indicates that site water is not deleterious to leaching performance, and may in fact improve extraction, most likely due to the existing high chloride content in the water prior to adding leach reagents. Note that 22.5 hour extractions assume a wash step to capture precipitated metal solids, which the company has integrated into its base-case flowsheet, while the 8 hour samples did not undergo the wash step. Composite Sample Chalcocite, Covellite, Bornite Chalcopyrite Carrolite Cu% Est Ag (g/t) Est Co (ppm) Cu Extraction (%, 8 hr) Ag Extraction (%, 8 hr) Co Extraction (%, 8 hr) Cu Extraction (%, 22.5 hr) Ag Extraction (%, 22.5 hr) Co Extraction (%, 22.5 hr) Composite (Site Water) 25 44 2 1.15 12 470 82.5% 86.2% 2.4% 95.8% 93.6% 30.6% Composite (Tap Water) 25 44 2 1.15 12 470 84.5% 88.0% - 95.1% 92.9% 24.0% 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Figure 1 Drillhole collar locations of holes utilised in recent metallurgical test work at Elizabeth Creek. 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Figure 2 Chloride leach kinetic extraction curves for copper in Emmie Bluff Pre-Variability samples. Note the significant improvement associated with the completion of a short wash cycle following 24 hours of leaching. Figure 3 Chloride leach kinetic extraction curves for silver in Emmie Bluff Pre-Variability samples. Note the improvement associated with the completion of a short wash cycle following 24 hours of leaching - still present, though not as significant as observed for copper, above. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Extraction % Time (h) Whole-Ore Chloride Leaching, Emmie Bluff Pre-Variability - Copper Lower 50, Head Grade: 2.13% Cu Merged 46, Head Grade: 1.51% Cu Upper 50, Head Grade: 1.11% Cu Upper 51, Head Grade: 0.69% Cu Lower 51, Head Grade: 0.41% Cu WASHED SAMPLE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Extraction % Time (h) Whole-Ore Chloride Leaching, Emmie Bluff Pre-Variability - Silver Lower 50, Head Grade: 11.4g/t Ag Merged 46, Head Grade: 14.5g/t Ag Upper 50, Head Grade: 12.2g/t Ag Upper 51, Head Grade: 11.2g/t Ag Lower 51, Head Grade: 4.1g/t Ag WASHED SAMPLE 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Implications and Significance to the Elizabeth Creek PFS Coda is highly encouraged by the results, which continue to support whole-ore chloride leach as its preferred base case for the Elizabeth Creek PFS. Chalcopyrite content appears to have a modest influence on leach speed and extraction, although the results demonstrate that chalcopyrite and other key minerals can be leached effectively under near-neutral laboratory conditions. The final leach duration remains under assessment and is expected to be longer than was anticipated during the Scoping Study. While test work was completed to 24 hours, a shorter leach duration may be possible given the very flat nature of the kinetic leach curves between 8 and 24 hours (see Figure 2 and Figure 3, above). PFS process engineering will refine tank sizing to suit the final leach conditions. A longer leach duration would be expected to increase tankage requirements and associated capital cost, however, this may be partially offset by the increase in solids ratio from original scoping study assumptions. Tanks are a relatively straightforward modification to the flowsheet, however, any impact has yet to be quantified. The final requirements will reflect the assessment of solids ratio, leach duration, extraction performance and plant design. Based on this work, average net metal recovery assumed in the PFS is expected to remain close to the estimates provided during that study of 94.8% Cu and 98.2% Ag5, though again, further work will be required to confirm these figures. Final PFS recovery assumptions will, depend on completion of the broader variability programme including additional test work at MG14 and Windabout, downstream recovery test work and process modelling. Cobalt Cobalt extraction, though variable, is encouraging, having exceeded 50% in more than one sample and averaging approximately 40% across the 4 representative Emmie Bluff samples. Improving this low overall extraction and providing a more consistent result has been one of Coda’s key priorities over the past several months. The leaching challenge appears to stem from the principal cobalt host mineral at Elizabeth Creek: carrollite. Carrollite is a relatively uncommon thiospinel-structure Cu-Co sulphide, giving it a tight packed crystal lattice which is resistant to oxidative leaching. Carrollite can also suffer relatively rapid passivation (a process whereby a thin film of waste products from the leach process form on sulphide surfaces, physically preventing the leach chemistry from attacking fresh sulphides). Carrollite also hosts its Cobalt in the 3+ oxidation state rather than the 2+ state, which makes holding the ion in solution more challenging once it has been dissolved from the sulphide. The improved cobalt extractions achieved over the last several tests are the result of tweaks made to the leach chemistry, and the Company will continue to test minor adjustments to chemistries and physical properties of the feed ore to stabilise and improve cobalt extraction. Additionally, the company is continuing to test concentration technologies which may be applied to the leach residue, including magnetic separation and traditional low-cost flotation to generate a cobalt concentrate which may be further processed to improve overall net recovery. Regardless of the results of these upcoming experiments, the results already achieved to date strongly suggest that material percentage of the contained cobalt can be extracted from Elizabeth Creek mineralisation using this method. All previous economic estimates for an Elizabeth Creek Project using a whole-ore chloride leach flowsheet have assumed zero recovery/revenue from Cobalt, however, assuming continued replication of these or similar results, the Company will seek to include cobalt in future economic assumptions. 5 For more details, see “New Flowsheet Delivers Significant Cu-Ag Economic Uplift”, released to the market on 28 August 2025 and available at https://codaminerals.com/announcements/7126651 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Next steps Several key workstreams remain ongoing within the broader umbrella of the overall PFS metallurgical programme. The company is currently: • awaiting final comminution test work data which will inform the design of crushing and grinding circuits in the PFS; • undertaking residue concentration tests using magnetic and flotation separation to improve net cobalt recovery from the chloride leach process; • finalising downstream test work from the chloride leach process to confirm solvent extraction efficiency, identify optimal products for zinc and cobalt6 and confirm OPEX associated with metal recovery; and • undertaking test work in Adelaide to clarify the potential for the project’s backstop flotation-based flowsheet, including options to produce a split cobalt concentrate, which, if successful, could allow development of the Elizabeth Creek project with a much smaller downstream processing circuit, and potentially significantly reduced CAPEX. Finally, with the chloride leach flowsheet effectively finalised, the Company is also launching a chemical modelling exercise via Ausenco, who have been engaged as principal process engineers, to confirm key inputs and recyclability of reagents for a detailed understanding of process OPEX. With this information, and that derived from ongoing test work programmes, Coda expects to be able to select a final flowsheet and proceed to detailed design and engineering in support of the final PFS, detailed water balance, tailings characterisation and other associated studies. Figure 4 Downstream copper solvent extraction test work: prior to extraction (left) and following extraction (right). 6 Copper cathode and silver doré have been identified for some time by Coda as preferred, highly saleable products, however additional work is required to confirm similarly optimal products for cobalt and zinc, though the company is confident that both products are saleable at the volumes expected to be produced. This may include negotiating preliminary offtake agreements or less formal investigations for the regional and global market for various products to identify demand and payability. 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Next Steps – Wider PFS Coda is progressing the Elizabeth Creek PFS across multiple technical disciplines, with metallurgical work advancing alongside resource assessment, geotechnical, groundwater, tailings, environmental and mine planning studies. The next phase is focused on completing key studies and bringing their findings together to inform project design and engineering. These activities are expected to provide the basis for further announcements as results become available and their implications for the PFS are assessed. Key areas of progress and anticipated news flow include: • Completion of supporting studies: Waste-rock characterisation, flood modelling and comminution test work are expected to be completed in the near term. These studies will inform waste-rock management, assessment of flood conditions and the design of the crushing and grinding circuits, providing inputs into the broader project design. • Groundwater drilling at Emmie Bluff: Work is well advanced on Coda’s deepest production bore at Emmie Bluff. This forms part of the ongoing groundwater programme, which is developing the information needed to inform water planning for the project. Further updates may include drilling progress and findings from the programme. • Process modelling and engineering: Coda has selected Ausenco as its principal process engineering consultant, with metallurgical modelling now underway. This work will help translate the laboratory results into process design inputs and support assessment of the proposed plant’s operating requirements. • Integration of the wider PFS studies: Resource assessment, geotechnical, tailings, environmental and mine planning work continues in parallel. Findings from these programmes will be considered alongside the metallurgical and groundwater work as the PFS develops. Together, these workstreams are building the technical foundation for the next stage of project assessment. Future updates are expected to cover study completions, engineering progress and their significance for Elizabeth Creek. The timing and scope of announcements will depend on completion of the underlying work and assessment of the results. 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Technical Details Sample Compositing and Drillhole Details Samples were selected based on a combination of availability and diversity, with the company targeting a diverse range of grades and mineralogies, as well as geographic spread across the Emmie Bluff deposit, and a representative sample from the open pit deposits (in this case, from Windabout). Collar details for these drillholes are provided as Table 3 and displayed as Figure 1. The material utilised consisted of a series of composites generated from coarse reject material in the case of the Emmie Bluff sample, and material which was identified as surplus to requirements for comminution work at the Windabout deposit7. The samples utilised including key assay results are outlined as Table 4. Table 3 Drillhole collar details for holes utilised in recent metallurgical test work at Elizabeth Creek. All collars are reported in GDA94, MGA Zone 53. Prospect HoleID Easting (mE) Northing (mN) RL (m AHD) EOH Depth (m) Collar Dip (deg) Collar Azi (deg) EOH Dip (deg) EOH Azi (deg) Survey Method Tenement Associated Comp. Emmie Bluff DD25EB0046 706512 6555271 168 441.5 -80 270 -81.79 274.83 GPS EL 6265 DD25EB0046_Merged Emmie Bluff DD25EB0047A 706307 6555776 161 468 -70 130 -72.87 130.41 GPS EL 6265 Composite (Site Water) Emmie Bluff DD25EB0048 706293 6556351 169 474.39 -75 270 -74.52 265.79 GPS EL 6265 Composite (Site Water) Emmie Bluff DD26EB0049 705237 6556215 162 459.4 -70 190 -69.66 190.31 GPS EL 6265 Composite (Site Water) Emmie Bluff DD26EB0050 705645 6555780 168 443.05 -75 270 -77.42 277.22 GPS EL 6265 DD26EB0050_Upper, DD26EB0050_Lower Emmie Bluff DD26EB0051 705041 6556599 156 486.35 -70 135 -69.52 130.73 GPS EL 6265 DD26EB0051_Upper, DD26EB0051_Lower Windabout DD25WIND0004 703204 6524664 104 100.7 -70 90 -72.12 98.18 GPS EL 6518 DD25WIND0004_Upper Flowsheet details Coda is employing a pre-patent whole-ore chloride leach process which utilises chloride rich water and air sparging to promote oxidation of sulphides8. The process has evolved since the Company’s last detailed release9, but functionally remains similar: sample is ground to P80 75μm and leached in a chloride solution at 90⁰C with sparged air for up to 24 hours. Test work was undertaken at a 10% pulp density using a stirred reactor with samples taken periodically to assess extraction over time. Samples received a short wash cycle following leaching to redissolve and capture any metal precipitates, improving net extraction. pH was maintained near-neutral to prevent dissolution of dolomite and production of excess CO2. The process uses readily commercially obtainable chemicals as lixiviants, and the only fully consumed reagent is air, with the remainder anticipated to be highly recyclable (to be confirmed through modelling in the coming weeks). 7 See “Sample Compositing and Drillhole Details” below for full details on samples and compositing. 8 The Company is choosing to maintain certain specific properties of the process as commercial-in-confidence pending patent submission to maintain novelty and prevent prior-art disclosure. 9 See “Material Uplift in Copper and Silver Recoveries”, released to the market on 26 June 2025, available at https://codaminerals.com/announcements/7023903 6 Altona Street, West Perth Western Australia, 6005 E: info@codaminerals.com ABN 49 625 763 957 Table 4 Details for samples used in metallurgical testwork composite generation. Hole Comp. Sample From To Int. Cu Co Ag Ni Zn Pb Mg Fe S m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % % % DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0667 416.88 417.07 0.19 0.776 648 11.2 150 828 108 2.45 1.39 0.315 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0668 417.07 417.32 0.25 2.1 313 44.8 75 1810 2460 1.97 1.39 0.83 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0669 417.32 417.62 0.3 0.896 2050 7 210 576 540 2.91 1.65 0.56 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0670 417.62 418.07 0.45 1.75 1060 16.6 115 2340 962 2.55 2.4 1.55 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0671 418.07 418.6 0.53 0.824 247 8.6 65 3580 1590 3.93 2.62 1.48 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0675 419.92 420.15 0.23 0.572 631 3.2 85 1140 488 5.49 3.06 1.07 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0676 420.15 420.66 0.51 2.01 1540 16.4 325 4540 1720 1.69 2.32 1.39 DD25EB0046 DD25EB0046_Merged D25Z0677 420.66 421.4 0.74 0.576 107 6.8 60 408 167 0.72 1.71 0.195 DD25EB0047A EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0711 448.09 448.24 0.15 0.924 206 9.4 75 2450 1430 1.96 3.11 2 DD25EB0047A EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0712 448.24 448.42 0.18 0.673 152 7 50 1240 200 2.83 2.98 1.41 DD25EB0047A EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0713 448.42 448.68 0.26 1.19 533 5.4 80 1850 297 3.32 2.93 1.47 DD25EB0047A EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0714 448.68 448.82 0.14 2.51 1750 12.8 215 8190 2070 2.69 2.36 1.71 DD25EB0047A EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0715 448.82 449 0.18 1.68 41 23.4 25 4400 1410 4.51 1.98 0.69 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0723 429.68 430.56 0.88 1.47 1220 11.4 190 1300 594 3.89 1.64 0.775 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0724 430.56 430.9 0.34 2.34 1950 13.8 270 2260 766 2.26 3.05 2.8 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0725 430.9 431.69 0.79 1.52 615 13.4 105 2200 764 2.5 3.16 2.41 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0726 431.69 431.92 0.23 0.702 182 7.2 45 1020 628 4.97 2.88 1.47 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0766 452.57 452.71 0.14 0.423 248 12 60 322 184 1.4 4.18 2.89 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0768 452.71 452.88 0.17 0.684 225 10.2 60 234 170 1.32 2.8 2.16 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0769 452.88 453.02 0.14 0.427 79 3.8 25 54 86 3.08 3.87 1.96 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0772 454.18 454.43 0.25 0.797 48 3.2 20 144 31 2.89 3.79 1.61 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0776 455 455.21 0.21 0.315 39 2.6 20 426 30 1.18 2.73 0.91 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0778 455 455.21 0.21 0.361 33 2.6 20 412 30 1.21 2.69 0.955 DD25EB0048 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0779 455.21 455.86 0.65 0.632 60 6.4 45 940 430 2.65 3.77 1.83 DD26EB0049 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0806 416.61 417.16 0.55 2.67 1860 21.8 220 2790 1640 2.86 3.02 2.45 DD26EB0049 EB Site Water Test Composite D25Z0807 417.16 417.42 0.26 0.428 94 5.4 20 738 413 6.57 3.57 0.945 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Upper D26Z007 404.08 404.3 0.22 2.16 1960 15 260 2410 1150 3 2.07 1.37 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Upper D26Z008 404.3 404.74 0.44 1.64 1100 10.8 145 2660 1290 1.85 2.9 1.97 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Upper D26Z009 404.74 405.15 0.41 0.512 153 10.8 55 2100 559 2.44 3.48 2.12 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Upper D26Z0011 405.15 405.57 0.42 0.43 305 16.2 65 2900 940 1.89 3.63 2.45 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Lower D26Z0041 423.2 424.06 0.86 0.981 125 9.4 45 2220 471 4.67 3.41 2.45 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Lower D26Z0042 424.06 424.43 0.37 3.01 1540 10.2 305 8310 1740 4.37 3.02 2.8 DD26EB0050 DD26EB0050_Lower D26Z0043 424.43 424.77 0.34 5.14 3270 29.6 785 17900 5380 1.31 0.94 2.52 DD26EB0051 DD26EB0051_Upper D25Z0986 419 420 1 0.574 30 14.6 20 184 238 2.87 1.59 0.205 DD26EB0051 DD26EB0051_Upper D25Z0988 420.31 420.83 0.52 1.06 955 12.6 130 1220 474 3.56 1.65 0.615 DD26EB0051 DD26EB0051_Upper D25Z0990 421.15 421.65 0.5 1.15 657 7 90 1620 760 3.36 2.12 0.95 DD26EB0051 DD26EB0051_Lower D25Z1062 465.7 466.49 0.79 0.306 134 5.6 70 206 143 2.44 4.08 1.87 DD26EB0051 DD26EB0051_Lower D25Z1064 466.49 467.49 1 0.419 103 2.2 85 766 124 1.37 2.9 1.17 DD26EB0051 DD26EB0051_Lower D25Z1065 467.49 468.03 0.54 0.319 25 1.2 55 2500 322 0.67 1.55 0.5 DD26EB0052 DD26EB0052_Upper D26Z0046 415.74 416.74 1 0.237 150 3.4 35 142 35 3.01 1.28 0.115 DD26EB0052 DD26EB0052_Upper D26Z0049 417.87 418.87 1 0.508 199 12.2 60 1960 982 2.64 3.15 2.01 DD26EB0052 DD26EB0052_Upper D26Z0050 418.87 419.87 1 0.252 127 8.4 55 2050 553 2.63 3.33 1.96